From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Automatic adjustment of P and T states according to load? Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 18:09:10 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20021110170910.GA2544@elf.ucw.cz> References: <8765vbhtws.fsf@lexx.delysid.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8765vbhtws.fsf-lBiwR96x4xkvSoioSV8wqQ@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Mario Lang Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > writing a little script, jslow and jfast, to set P1:T1 and P0:T0. > But it would really be more efficient if I could convince the > kernel to do adjustments of Throttling, and especially also > the Performance state if load is low or high. C1/C2 should be able to hande idle system. Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf