From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Poor man's ACPI bug list Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 18:50:25 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20021110175025.GC2544@elf.ucw.cz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Jan Rychter Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Since for some reason some people believe that it's better if testers > maintain buglists, here goes: It would be even better if testers fixed bugs ;-). > Poor man's ACPI bug list $Revision: 1.2 $. > > The following is a list of ACPI bugs that I have encountered on my > system, along with the best debug information that I could gather. I > hope it will help the ACPI developers in fixing the bugs. It would be nice if you mentioned kernel version. Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf