From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sander Smeenk Subject: Re: Newbie looking to try latest ACPI support... Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 16:11:36 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20021207151136.GR15904@dot.freshdot.net> References: <3DF20AB4.3020205@gulik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DF20AB4.3020205-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Gregory Gulik Cc: acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Quoting Gregory Gulik (greg-eIr5aKVv5JjYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org): > I was hoping to try out a newer development driver but I'm not sure if > it's best to just try the acpi-20020918 for which 2.4.18 patches are > available, or should I not bother with those and go with the latest > drivers for 2.4.20, which obviously means upgrading to that kernel??? I'd say upgrade to that kernel. :) -- | Age is a very high price to pay for maturity. | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf