From: Ducrot Bruno <poup-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>,
kernel list
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
ACPI mailing list
<acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: [2.5.50, ACPI] link error
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:28:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021209102858.GA14882@poup.poupinou.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021208194944.GB19604-jyMamyUUXNJG4ohzP4jBZS1Fcj925eT/@public.gmane.org>
Hi Pavel:
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 08:49:45PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > > Doesn't that imply your fix is broken to begin with?
> > > > >
> > > > > ACPI/S4 support needs swsusp. ACPI/S3 needs big part of
> > > > > swsusp. Splitting CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP to S3 and S4 part seems like
> > > > > overdesign to me, OTOH if you do the work it is okay with me.
> > > >
> > > > You broke the design. S3 support was developed long before swsusp was in
> > > > the kernel, and completely indpendent of it. It should have remained that
> > > > way.
> > > >
> > > > S3 support is a subset of what is need for S4 support.
> > >
> > > That's not true. acpi_wakeup.S is nasty piece of code, needed for S3
> > > but not for S4. Big part of driver support is only needed for S3.
> > >
> > > > swsusp is an implementation of S4 support. In theory, there could be
> > > > multiple implementations that all use the same core (saving/restoring
> > > > state).
> > >
> > > There were patches for S4bios floating around, but it never really
> > > worked, IIRC.
> >
> > No. It work. I do not resubmmited patches because I think that
> > swsusp is better.
>
> I think that s4bios is nice to have. Its similar to S3 and easier to
> set up than swsusp... It would be nice to have it.
for me:
pros:
-----
1- it is really really more easier to implement than S4;
2- we can even have it with 2.4 kernels (it seems that it work without
the need of freezing processes, but I suspect that this statement
is 'wrong' by nature).
cons:
-----
1- it is much slower (especially at save time) than your swsusp;
2- end users must setup their systems (need to create a suspend partition,
or to keep a vfat partition as the really first one (/dev/hda1));
3- we use a bios function. Actually, everything can happen...
That why I prefer swsusp at this time, or any other implementation of S4 (I
think about an implementation of S4 via LKCD).
Cheers,
--
Ducrot Bruno
http://www.poupinou.org Page profaissionelle
http://toto.tu-me-saoules.com Haume page
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-09 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20021205224019.GH7396@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0212051632120.974-100000@localhost.localdomain>
2002-12-06 0:06 ` [2.5.50, ACPI] link error Pavel Machek
2002-12-06 0:05 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-12-06 0:31 ` Pavel Machek
2002-12-06 0:36 ` Jeff Garzik
[not found] ` <20021206000618.GB15784-jyMamyUUXNJG4ohzP4jBZS1Fcj925eT/@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-06 18:57 ` [ACPI] " Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20021206185702.GE17595-j6u/t2rXLliUoIHC/UFpr9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-06 23:05 ` Ducrot Bruno
2002-12-08 19:49 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20021208194944.GB19604-jyMamyUUXNJG4ohzP4jBZS1Fcj925eT/@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-08 20:46 ` Constantinos Antoniou
[not found] ` <1039380380.1614.57.camel-coIz1MXBdV0@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-09 10:40 ` Ducrot Bruno
2002-12-09 10:28 ` Ducrot Bruno [this message]
2002-12-09 19:12 Grover, Andrew
[not found] ` <EDC461A30AC4D511ADE10002A5072CAD04C7A581-OU+JdkIUtvd9zuciVAfUoVDQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-10 0:49 ` Alan Cox
[not found] ` <1039481341.12046.21.camel-MMxVpc8zpTQVh3rx8e9g/fyykp6/JSeS3vcXtXqGYxw@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-10 20:40 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20021210204031.GF20049-jyMamyUUXNJG4ohzP4jBZS1Fcj925eT/@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-10 20:50 ` Andrew McGregor
[not found] ` <23440000.1039553448-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-11 10:14 ` Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20021211101438.GC29390-j6u/t2rXLliUoIHC/UFpr9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-11 16:00 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-11 10:07 ` Ducrot Bruno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021209102858.GA14882@poup.poupinou.org \
--to=poup-kk6yzipjem5g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mochel-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox