From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "P. Christeas" Subject: Re: 2.5.51: sleep broken Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:22:57 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <200212122022.57930.p_christ@hol.gr> References: <200212101534.12838.p_christ@hol.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200212101534.12838.p_christ-U04EIuiosng@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org I've had a better look at it... I have written: > I 've just tested the 2.5.51 (w. official 20021205 ACPI) > I noted that S1 is broken now (had worked long since) > > In dmesg I note: > ACPI: Wakeup code way too big, will crash on attempt to suspend Seems irrelevant. > However, /proc/acpi/sleep has all S0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 > When I 'echo 1 >/proc/acpi/sleep', nothing happens. > I'll let you know if I have more details.. I noticed I had some extra dbg code to indicate what's happening in the procfs level. Now, it seems that "1" doesn't get written to the acpi/sleep entry. It's a procfs bug. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/