From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Kohlsmith Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_ACPI_RELAXED_AML option Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:05:17 -0500 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <200212161105.17500@-mixdown.ca> References: <20021216143410.21977.qmail@web14502.mail.yahoo.com> <1040055593.13786.56.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1040055593.13786.56.camel-MMxVpc8zpTQVh3rx8e9g/fyykp6/JSeS3vcXtXqGYxw@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > Intel want people to write valid AML. I don't think they'll ever succeed > but trying doesn't hurt. > > Vendors want working laptops I fail to see why writing valid AML is any more difficult than writing shitty AML. Especially in cases like *PNP0101 vs PNP0101. But I digress; I know I'm preaching to the converted. :-) Regards, Andrew ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/