From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Faye Pearson Subject: Re: heatload 0.4 now with throttling support Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:08:28 +0000 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20021218170828.GA9127@clara.net> References: <3E008120.5080908@uni-muenster.de> <20021218153355.GK347@poup.poupinou.org> <3E009EB5.7010109@muenster.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E009EB5.7010109-iYtK5bfT9M8b1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Malte Thoma Cc: Ducrot Bruno , ACPI-Devel List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Malte Thoma [thoma-iYtK5bfT9M8b1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org] wrote: > cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0 > > ... it seems to me that there are a LOT of different > proc/acpi-structures :-( > > /proc/acpi/thermal/0/status > /proc/acpi/thermal_zone > /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/temperature > /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THM0 As with most ACPI things, the name of the thermal_zone is defined by the DSDT table, and is arbitrary. You should read everything in the directory. > hope that the ACPI-group stabilize this ;-) They can't do anything about it. > until now heatload workes only for one CPU (i suppose the thermal_zone > is coherent to the counting of CPUs?) No, there could be a passive zone, a critical zone etc. Faye -- Faye Pearson, Covert Development ClaraNET Ltd. Tel 020 7903 3000 Convention is the ruler of all. -- Pindar ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Order your Holiday Geek Presents Now! Green Lasers, Hip Geek T-Shirts, Remote Control Tanks, Caffeinated Soap, MP3 Players, XBox Games, Flying Saucers, WebCams, Smart Putty. T H I N K G E E K . C O M http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/