public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* AW: Re: IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems
       [not found]               ` <200301022254.55856.dom-K271P2BsTd0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2002-02-02 22:20                 ` Jörg Hänsel
  2003-01-04 10:53                 ` Dom
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Hänsel @ 2002-02-02 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

Dear Dom,
I have a Thinkpad R32 and the same problem (could not use EDCT). I hope that
IBM will release a new BIOS since ACPI does not work perfectly in Windows
2000 and XP as well.
(Meanwhile I am using APM instead.)
When I load the ospm modules (battery, etc.) there is no subdirectory acpi
under /proc but "battery" occurs directly under /proc and is empty.

Bye,
Jörg


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
[mailto:acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org]Im Auftrag von Dom
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Januar 2003 22:55
An: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Betreff: Re: [ACPI] Re: IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems


Dear Sandro,

I posted the following message to the "Thinkpad A20,A21,A22,A30,A31" forum
at
IBM. Currently it looks like the posting has not been opened to public yet?
I
hope that IBM will provide a patch or that we can assist in creating a work
around for the buggy bios. I know several friends who are running Linux on
their A31's. Currently we all stick to kernel 2.4.19 + acpi-20020918 patch.
This combination provides at least some support for ACPI.

Thanks to the hard-working acpi-development team!
Dom

--------
Topic:      ACPI Linux (1 of 1), Read 10 times
Conf: ThinkPad A20,A21,A22,A30,A31
From: bartenst
Date: Thursday, January 02, 2003 03:07 PM

Hi all!

I am successfully running Gentoo Linux
(http://www.gentoo.org) on my new A31. Unfortunately
ACPI is not getting initialized properly with the new
acpi-patch from 20021212 ( + vanilla 2.4.20). I consulted
the acpi developers (http://acpi.sf.net) who told me that the
problem is the buggy BIOS! Is IBM aware of that problem
and are there any ongoing efforts to solve this problem?

Thanks!
Dom

p.s.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=103643408113691&w=2
summary:
"In short, ECDT -> EC_ID is supposed to be the full path
name of your EC device in ACPI Namespace like
"\_SB.PCI0.LPC.EC", but __NOT__ in your BIOS. You
can work around your problem by adding hack code, but it
makes OS
code dirty to save broken BIOSes and it allows BIOS
vendor not to fix their problem."
----------

On Thursday 02 January 2003 22:31, you wrote:
> > sorry - i did not see Andy Grover's reply to Sandro earlier on. So the
>
> problem
>
> > is a bug in the BIOS implementation. I have already contacted IBM via
> > "Ask
>
> an
>
> > expert" and posted a message to http://www7.pc.ibm.com/~Thinkpad and I
>
> really
>
> > hope that they will reply. I will keep you up to date.
>
> Uh!
> I didn't know that IBM has a forum. Where is your question located (I
can't
> find it)? Can you please email me if you find a solution for the whole
> prob? I also questioned IBM about that prob a few days ago, but via
support
> - no answer so far.
>
> Sandro


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Acpi-devel mailing list
Acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems
@ 2003-01-01 13:45 Dom
       [not found] ` <200301011445.31369.dom-K271P2BsTd0@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dom @ 2003-01-01 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

Hi!

I have got a IBM Thinkpad A31 notebook (BIOS Version 1.04, 
http://www.pc.ibm.com/support?lang=en_US&doctype=&subtype=All&page=brand&up=unknownuser1004106089&menu=model&brand=IBM+ThinkPad&family=IBM+ThinkPad%7CThinkPad+A31&machineType=IBM+ThinkPad%7CThinkPad+A31%7C2652&model=IBM+ThinkPad%7CThinkPad+A31%7C2652%7CM5G) 
which is running Gentoo Linux 1.4_rc1. The previous gentoo-kernel based on 
2.4.19 with acpi-20020918 is running quite smoothley except for some problems 
with the battery state:
 
---- fragment of /var/log/messages: 2.4.19 + acpi20020918 + gentoo patches 
---------
Jan  1 14:35:38 [kernel]  exstore-0278 [19] Ex_store_object_to_ind: Could not 
store object to indexed package element
Jan  1 14:35:38 [kernel] Method pathname:  \_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BST 
(Node 42ebd4a8)
-------------

Now I compiled a new kernel 2.4.20 with the acpi kernel patch-20021212 and 
ACPI does not work anymore. :-( 
"ACPI: Found ECDT
ACPI: Could not use ECDT"
How comes? If it is of any help to you I would provide further information 
(log messages, etc.) regarding this issue. Thanks in advance for any help! 

---- dmesg: 2.4.20 vanilla + acpi20021212 -----------
Linux version 2.4.20 (root@jonas) (gcc version 3.2) #2 Wed Jan 1 14:08:19 CET 
2003
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
 BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009f000 (usable)
 BIOS-e820: 000000000009f000 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: 00000000000d2000 - 00000000000d4000 (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: 00000000000dc000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000002ff60000 (usable)
 BIOS-e820: 000000002ff60000 - 000000002ff7a000 (ACPI data)
 BIOS-e820: 000000002ff7a000 - 000000002ff7c000 (ACPI NVS)
 BIOS-e820: 000000002ff7c000 - 0000000030000000 (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: 00000000ff800000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
767MB LOWMEM available.
ACPI: have wakeup address 0xc0001000
On node 0 totalpages: 196448
zone(0): 4096 pages.
zone(1): 192352 pages.
zone(2): 0 pages.
ACPI: RSDP (v002 IBM                        ) @ 0x000f7060
ACPI: XSDT (v001 IBM    TP-1G    00000.04160) @ 0x2ff6ee48
ACPI: FADT (v001 IBM    TP-1G    00000.04160) @ 0x2ff6ee8c
ACPI: SSDT (v001 IBM    TP-1G    00000.04160) @ 0x2ff6ef40
ACPI: ECDT (v001 IBM    TP-1G    00000.04160) @ 0x2ff79f87
ACPI: BOOT (v001 IBM    TP-1G    00000.04160) @ 0x2ff79fd8
ACPI: DSDT (v001 IBM    TP-1G    00000.04160) @ 0x00000000
ACPI: BIOS passes blacklist
ACPI: MADT not present
IBM machine detected. Enabling interrupts during APM calls.
Kernel command line: root=/dev/hda3 append="hdc=ide-scsi"
No local APIC present or hardware disabled
Initializing CPU#0
Detected 1798.514 MHz processor.
Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
Calibrating delay loop... 3591.37 BogoMIPS
Memory: 773844k/785792k available (2003k kernel code, 11560k reserved, 678k 
data, 132k init, 0k highmem)
Dentry cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes)
Inode cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 7, 524288 bytes)
Mount-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
Buffer-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
Page-cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes)
CPU: L1 I cache: 0K, L1 D cache: 8K
CPU: L2 cache: 512K
Intel machine check architecture supported.
Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
CPU:     After generic, caps: 3febf9ff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU:             Common caps: 3febf9ff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 Mobile CPU 1.80GHz stepping 04
Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
mtrr: v1.40 (20010327) Richard Gooch (rgooch-r1x6VkxMR+00zabcByZE4g@public.gmane.org)
mtrr: detected mtrr type: Intel
ACPI: Subsystem revision 20021212
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd8fe, last bus=8
PCI: Using configuration type 1
 tbxface-0099 [03] Acpi_load_tables      : ACPI Tables successfully acquired
Parsing all Control 
Methods:.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Table [DSDT] - 1276 Objects with 64 Devices 393 Methods 18 Regions
Parsing all Control Methods:
Table [SSDT] - 0 Objects with 0 Devices 0 Methods 0 Regions
ACPI Namespace successfully loaded at root c03dc71c
evxfevnt-0074 [04] Acpi_enable           : Transition to ACPI mode successful
   evgpe-0263: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE15
   evgpe-0263: *** Info: GPE Block1 defined as GPE16 to GPE31
ACPI: Found ECDT
ACPI: Could not use ECDT
evxfevnt-0119 [06] Acpi_disable          : ACPI mode disabled
 utalloc-0968 [05] Ut_dump_allocations   : No outstanding allocations.
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
PCI: ACPI tables contain no PCI IRQ routing entries
PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00)
Transparent bridge - Intel Corp. 82801BAM/CAM PCI Bridge
PCI: Discovered primary peer bus 09 [IRQ]
PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX [8086/248c] at 00:1f.0
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:1f.1
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:1d.2
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 02:02.0
Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4
Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
Initializing RT netlink socket
Starting kswapd
devfs: v1.12c (20020818) Richard Gooch (rgooch-r1x6VkxMR+00zabcByZE4g@public.gmane.org)
devfs: boot_options: 0x1
Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 1996 okir-pn4DOG8n3UYbFoVRYvo4fw@public.gmane.org).
pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured
Serial driver version 5.05c (2001-07-08) with MANY_PORTS SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI 
enabled
ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:1f.6
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:1f.3
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:1f.5
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 02:00.1
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
ICH3M: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev f9
PCI: Enabling device 00:1f.1 (0005 -> 0007)
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:1f.1
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:1d.2
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 02:02.0
ICH3M: chipset revision 2
ICH3M: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
    ide0: BM-DMA at 0x1860-0x1867, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
    ide1: BM-DMA at 0x1868-0x186f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
hda: IC25N040ATCS04-0, ATA DISK drive
hdc: DW-28E, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
blk: queue c03f3624, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0xffffffff)
hda: 78140160 sectors (40008 MB) w/1768KiB Cache, CHS=5168/240/63, UDMA(100)
hdc: ATAPI 24X DVD-ROM CD-R/RW drive, 1658kB Cache, UDMA(33)
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.12
Partition check:
 /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 p2 p3
eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker 
http://www.scyld.com/network/eepro100.html
eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.36 $ 2000/11/17 Modified by Andrey V. Savochkin 
<saw-5bpFXmC1L3aJ4eUNlOKu3Q@public.gmane.org> and others
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 02:08.0
eth0: Intel Corp. 82801CAM (ICH3) PRO/100 VE (LOM) Ethernet Controller, 
00:D0:59:CF:10:21, IRQ 11.
  Board assembly 000000-000, Physical connectors present: RJ45
  Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1.
  General self-test: passed.
  Serial sub-system self-test: passed.
  Internal registers self-test: passed.
  ROM checksum self-test: passed (0x04f4518b).
Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 690M
agpgart: Detected Intel i845 chipset
agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xe0000000
[drm] Initialized tdfx 1.0.0 20010216 on minor 0
[drm] AGP 0.99 on Intel i845 @ 0xe0000000 64MB
[drm] Initialized radeon 1.1.1 20010405 on minor 1
[drm] AGP 0.99 on Intel i845 @ 0xe0000000 64MB
[drm] Initialized i810 1.2.0 20010920 on minor 2
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k scsi_hostadapter, errno = 2
es1371: version v0.30 time 14:10:24 Jan  1 2003
Linux Kernel Card Services 3.1.22
  options:  [pci] [cardbus] [pm]
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 02:00.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:1d.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 01:00.0
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 02:00.1
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:1f.3
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:1f.5
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:1f.6
usb.c: registered new driver hub
Yenta IRQ list 04b8, PCI irq11
Socket status: 30000006
Yenta IRQ list 04b8, PCI irq11
Socket status: 30000006
uhci.c: USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver v1.1
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:1d.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 01:00.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 02:00.0
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 00:1d.0 to 64
uhci.c: USB UHCI at I/O 0x1800, IRQ 11
usb.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
hub.c: USB hub found
hub.c: 2 ports detected
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:1d.1
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 00:1d.1 to 64
uhci.c: USB UHCI at I/O 0x1820, IRQ 11
usb.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2
hub.c: USB hub found
hub.c: 2 ports detected
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:1d.2
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:1f.1
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 02:02.0
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 00:1d.2 to 64
uhci.c: USB UHCI at I/O 0x1840, IRQ 11
usb.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 3
hub.c: USB hub found
hub.c: 2 ports detected
Initializing USB Mass Storage driver...
usb.c: registered new driver usb-storage
USB Mass Storage support registered.
NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0
IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP
IP: routing cache hash table of 8192 buckets, 64Kbytes
TCP: Hash tables configured (established 262144 bind 65536)
NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0.
reiserfs: checking transaction log (device 03:03) ...
Using r5 hash to sort names
ReiserFS version 3.6.25
VFS: Mounted root (reiserfs filesystem) readonly.
Mounted devfs on /dev
Freeing unused kernel memory: 132k freed
Adding Swap: 1028152k swap-space (priority -1)
-------------------


Thanks and a happy new year!
Dominik


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* RE: IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems
       [not found] ` <200301011445.31369.dom-K271P2BsTd0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2003-01-01 14:13   ` Adachi, Kenichi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Adachi, Kenichi @ 2003-01-01 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Dom', acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

> Now I compiled a new kernel 2.4.20 with the acpi kernel 
> patch-20021212 and 
> ACPI does not work anymore. :-( 
> "ACPI: Found ECDT
> ACPI: Could not use ECDT"
> How comes? If it is of any help to you I would provide 
> further information

It must be (well) known, but I don't have precise information. Please
check out the ML archive for ECDT support status in the latest code. You
can surely find out the right answer with full description.

# FWIW, any version of Windows aren't yet __fully__ ACPI 2.0 compatible
so far, and they simply ignore ECDT if present.  




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems
@ 2003-01-01 14:55 Dom
       [not found] ` <200301011555.06058.dom-K271P2BsTd0@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dom @ 2003-01-01 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks Adachi, Kenichi for your immediate reply!

I browsed the mailing list archives (December 2002, November 2002) and 
encountered several postings from Sandro (PSI-Systems <psi-systems-8XqT/MH+8ao@public.gmane.org>) 
who is having the same problem with his Thinkpad A31 laptop: 
ACPI: Found ECDT
ACPI: Could not use ECDT
evxfevnt-0119 [06] Acpi_disable          : ACPI mode disabled

ACPI is completely disabled for IBM Thinkpad A31. Is there a solution for that 
problem available? How can I be of any help to the ACPI developers?

Thanks for any hints!
Dom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+EwFHlkLhXFdQXXkRArzFAJ9GsIcHcw+7LS16xwK59Vf5CuVkWgCfcKH9
2jQiER0GT5TOn92UKnEL0NM=
=VzQL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* RE: Re: IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems
       [not found] ` <200301011555.06058.dom-K271P2BsTd0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2003-01-02 17:29   ` Adachi, Kenichi
       [not found]     ` <000301c2b284$8a15d8f0$232202d3-F8JvWDuGsZU@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Adachi, Kenichi @ 2003-01-02 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dom-K271P2BsTd0, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

> I browsed the mailing list archives (December 2002, November 2002) and

> encountered several postings from Sandro (PSI-Systems
<psi-systems-8XqT/MH+8ao@public.gmane.org>) 
> who is having the same problem with his Thinkpad A31 laptop: 
> ACPI: Found ECDT
> ACPI: Could not use ECDT
> evxfevnt-0119 [06] Acpi_disable          : ACPI mode disabled
> 
> ACPI is completely disabled for IBM Thinkpad A31. Is there a 
> solution for that 
> problem available? How can I be of any help to the ACPI developers?
> 

Did you also read Andy Grover's reply to Sandro? 

Subject:  RE: [ACPI] ACPI does not work since
acpi-20021022-2.4.20-pre11.di
From:     "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover () intel ! com>
Date:     2002-11-04 18:19:30
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=103643408113691&w=2

In short, ECDT -> EC_ID is supposed to be the full path name of your EC
device in ACPI Namespace like "\_SB.PCI0.LPC.EC", but __NOT__ in your
BIOS. 
You can work around your problem by adding hack code, but it makes OS
code dirty to save broken BIOSes and it allows BIOS vendor not to fix
their problem.




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems
       [not found]     ` <000301c2b284$8a15d8f0$232202d3-F8JvWDuGsZU@public.gmane.org>
@ 2003-01-02 20:25       ` Dom
  2003-01-02 21:31         ` PSI-Systems
  2003-01-02 20:27       ` Thomas Geiger
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dom @ 2003-01-02 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

Dear Kenichi,

sorry - i did not see Andy Grover's reply to Sandro earlier on. So the problem 
is a bug in the BIOS implementation. I have already contacted IBM via "Ask an 
expert" and posted a message to http://www7.pc.ibm.com/~Thinkpad and I really 
hope that they will reply. I will keep you up to date.

Thanks,
Dominik

p.s. How ugly would a work around for the BIOS problem be? Aren't there 
already several work arounds for buggy BIOSes in the Linux kernel code?

On Thursday 02 January 2003 18:29, Adachi, Kenichi wrote:
> > I browsed the mailing list archives (December 2002, November 2002) and
> >
> > encountered several postings from Sandro (PSI-Systems
>
> <psi-systems-8XqT/MH+8ao@public.gmane.org>)
>
> > who is having the same problem with his Thinkpad A31 laptop:
> > ACPI: Found ECDT
> > ACPI: Could not use ECDT
> > evxfevnt-0119 [06] Acpi_disable          : ACPI mode disabled
> >
> > ACPI is completely disabled for IBM Thinkpad A31. Is there a
> > solution for that
> > problem available? How can I be of any help to the ACPI developers?
>
> Did you also read Andy Grover's reply to Sandro?
>
> Subject:  RE: [ACPI] ACPI does not work since
> acpi-20021022-2.4.20-pre11.di
> From:     "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover () intel ! com>
> Date:     2002-11-04 18:19:30
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=103643408113691&w=2
>
> In short, ECDT -> EC_ID is supposed to be the full path name of your EC
> device in ACPI Namespace like "\_SB.PCI0.LPC.EC", but __NOT__ in your
> BIOS.
> You can work around your problem by adding hack code, but it makes OS
> code dirty to save broken BIOSes and it allows BIOS vendor not to fix
> their problem.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems
       [not found]     ` <000301c2b284$8a15d8f0$232202d3-F8JvWDuGsZU@public.gmane.org>
  2003-01-02 20:25       ` Dom
@ 2003-01-02 20:27       ` Thomas Geiger
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Geiger @ 2003-01-02 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

Hi,

i'm also encountering the same problems with my (beloved ;) ) A31. So if there 
is a possible workaround - is anyone already working on it/how difficult 
would it be to implement such that hack?

Tom

On Thursday 02 January 2003 18:29, Adachi, Kenichi wrote:
> > I browsed the mailing list archives (December 2002, November 2002) and
> >
> > encountered several postings from Sandro (PSI-Systems
>
> <psi-systems-8XqT/MH+8ao@public.gmane.org>)
>
> > who is having the same problem with his Thinkpad A31 laptop:
> > ACPI: Found ECDT
> > ACPI: Could not use ECDT
> > evxfevnt-0119 [06] Acpi_disable          : ACPI mode disabled
> >
> > ACPI is completely disabled for IBM Thinkpad A31. Is there a
> > solution for that
> > problem available? How can I be of any help to the ACPI developers?
>
> Did you also read Andy Grover's reply to Sandro?
>
> Subject:  RE: [ACPI] ACPI does not work since
> acpi-20021022-2.4.20-pre11.di
> From:     "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover () intel ! com>
> Date:     2002-11-04 18:19:30
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=103643408113691&w=2
>
> In short, ECDT -> EC_ID is supposed to be the full path name of your EC
> device in ACPI Namespace like "\_SB.PCI0.LPC.EC", but __NOT__ in your
> BIOS.
> You can work around your problem by adding hack code, but it makes OS
> code dirty to save broken BIOSes and it allows BIOS vendor not to fix
> their problem.
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Acpi-devel mailing list
> Acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel


-- 
thomas geiger
solution2u.net gmbh * am hof 4 * a-6861 alberschwende
fon +43 5579 85777-0 * fax +43 5574 54445-20 * mobil +43 664 38 12 645
http://solution2u.net/ * geiger-Cb7RZHV19h45EzxeNYqZ9w@public.gmane.org

have a nice day


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems
  2003-01-02 20:25       ` Dom
@ 2003-01-02 21:31         ` PSI-Systems
       [not found]           ` <004701c2b2a6$434732d0$0201a8c0-kjWjS56XVej+Hn7q9Vec/7NAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: PSI-Systems @ 2003-01-02 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dom, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

> sorry - i did not see Andy Grover's reply to Sandro earlier on. So the
problem
> is a bug in the BIOS implementation. I have already contacted IBM via "Ask
an
> expert" and posted a message to http://www7.pc.ibm.com/~Thinkpad and I
really
> hope that they will reply. I will keep you up to date.
Uh!
I didn't know that IBM has a forum. Where is your question located (I can't
find it)? Can you please email me if you find a solution for the whole prob?
I also questioned IBM about that prob a few days ago, but via support - no
answer so far.

Sandro



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems
       [not found]           ` <004701c2b2a6$434732d0$0201a8c0-kjWjS56XVej+Hn7q9Vec/7NAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
@ 2003-01-02 21:54             ` Dom
       [not found]               ` <200301022254.55856.dom-K271P2BsTd0@public.gmane.org>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dom @ 2003-01-02 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

Dear Sandro,

I posted the following message to the "Thinkpad A20,A21,A22,A30,A31" forum at 
IBM. Currently it looks like the posting has not been opened to public yet? I 
hope that IBM will provide a patch or that we can assist in creating a work 
around for the buggy bios. I know several friends who are running Linux on 
their A31's. Currently we all stick to kernel 2.4.19 + acpi-20020918 patch. 
This combination provides at least some support for ACPI. 

Thanks to the hard-working acpi-development team!
Dom

--------
Topic:      ACPI Linux (1 of 1), Read 10 times
Conf: ThinkPad A20,A21,A22,A30,A31
From: bartenst
Date: Thursday, January 02, 2003 03:07 PM

Hi all!

I am successfully running Gentoo Linux
(http://www.gentoo.org) on my new A31. Unfortunately
ACPI is not getting initialized properly with the new
acpi-patch from 20021212 ( + vanilla 2.4.20). I consulted
the acpi developers (http://acpi.sf.net) who told me that the
problem is the buggy BIOS! Is IBM aware of that problem
and are there any ongoing efforts to solve this problem?

Thanks!
Dom

p.s.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=103643408113691&w=2
summary:
"In short, ECDT -> EC_ID is supposed to be the full path
name of your EC device in ACPI Namespace like
"\_SB.PCI0.LPC.EC", but __NOT__ in your BIOS. You
can work around your problem by adding hack code, but it
makes OS
code dirty to save broken BIOSes and it allows BIOS
vendor not to fix their problem."
----------

On Thursday 02 January 2003 22:31, you wrote:
> > sorry - i did not see Andy Grover's reply to Sandro earlier on. So the
>
> problem
>
> > is a bug in the BIOS implementation. I have already contacted IBM via
> > "Ask
>
> an
>
> > expert" and posted a message to http://www7.pc.ibm.com/~Thinkpad and I
>
> really
>
> > hope that they will reply. I will keep you up to date.
>
> Uh!
> I didn't know that IBM has a forum. Where is your question located (I can't
> find it)? Can you please email me if you find a solution for the whole
> prob? I also questioned IBM about that prob a few days ago, but via support
> - no answer so far.
>
> Sandro


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems
       [not found]               ` <200301022254.55856.dom-K271P2BsTd0@public.gmane.org>
  2002-02-02 22:20                 ` AW: " Jörg Hänsel
@ 2003-01-04 10:53                 ` Dom
       [not found]                   ` <200301041153.42326.dom-K271P2BsTd0@public.gmane.org>
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dom @ 2003-01-04 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

Hi Thinkpad dudes out there,

1.) the following message was posted by an IBM employee on 
http://www7.pc.ibm.com/~Thinkpad

------------------
Topic: ACPI Linux (2 of 2), Read 6 times  
Conf: ThinkPad A20,A21,A22,A30,A31 
From: Theresa@IBM2 
Date: Friday, January 03, 2003 02:27 PM 
Hello Dom,
Unfortunately, we do not have any information on whether or not the BIOS will 
be updated to resolve the issue you are having with the ACPI. This is up to 
the IBM Software Developers.
 
Thank you for choosing the IBM Forums.
 
 
 Theresa L. IBM World-Wide Electronic Support and Services
---------------------

2.) thats the reply to my email sent to IBM technical support:

--------------------
Dear Mr. Bar,
you have contacted the technical support of IBM and we can't give you
marketing informations about future equipment. Please call our service
centre at 01803 - 31 32 33 and ask for someone who is able to inform you
about that.

Best regards
Your IBM eSupport



                         IBM Personal Computing Division
                         http://www.ibm.com/pc/support
--------------------

I will try to contact a developer at IBM ...

Greetings,
Dom

On Thursday 02 January 2003 22:54, Dom wrote:
> Dear Sandro,
>
> I posted the following message to the "Thinkpad A20,A21,A22,A30,A31" forum
> at IBM. Currently it looks like the posting has not been opened to public
> yet? I hope that IBM will provide a patch or that we can assist in creating
> a work around for the buggy bios. I know several friends who are running
> Linux on their A31's. Currently we all stick to kernel 2.4.19 +
> acpi-20020918 patch. This combination provides at least some support for
> ACPI.
>
> Thanks to the hard-working acpi-development team!
> Dom
>
> --------
> Topic:      ACPI Linux (1 of 1), Read 10 times
> Conf: ThinkPad A20,A21,A22,A30,A31
> From: bartenst
> Date: Thursday, January 02, 2003 03:07 PM
>
> Hi all!
>
> I am successfully running Gentoo Linux
> (http://www.gentoo.org) on my new A31. Unfortunately
> ACPI is not getting initialized properly with the new
> acpi-patch from 20021212 ( + vanilla 2.4.20). I consulted
> the acpi developers (http://acpi.sf.net) who told me that the
> problem is the buggy BIOS! Is IBM aware of that problem
> and are there any ongoing efforts to solve this problem?
>
> Thanks!
> Dom
>
> p.s.
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=103643408113691&w=2
> summary:
> "In short, ECDT -> EC_ID is supposed to be the full path
> name of your EC device in ACPI Namespace like
> "\_SB.PCI0.LPC.EC", but __NOT__ in your BIOS. You
> can work around your problem by adding hack code, but it
> makes OS
> code dirty to save broken BIOSes and it allows BIOS
> vendor not to fix their problem."
> ----------



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems
       [not found]                   ` <200301041153.42326.dom-K271P2BsTd0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2003-01-04 15:51                     ` Arndt Schoenewald
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Arndt Schoenewald @ 2003-01-04 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

Hmm ... if it turns out that IBM does not fix their BIOSes, I will have
to start advising people against buying Thinkpads. Period.

Perhaps we should find a way to make this very clear to IBM, and to
the other companies who think they will get away with not doing their
homework -- and of course to all potential buyers.

Nobody wants to give up their freedom, so the inability to run Linux on
a newly bought machine is something that will even annoy many of those
who are currently only interested in Windows.

Arndt


On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 11:53:42AM +0100, Dom wrote:
> Hi Thinkpad dudes out there,
> 
> 1.) the following message was posted by an IBM employee on 
> http://www7.pc.ibm.com/~Thinkpad
> 
> ------------------
> Topic: ACPI Linux (2 of 2), Read 6 times  
> Conf: ThinkPad A20,A21,A22,A30,A31 
> From: Theresa@IBM2 
> Date: Friday, January 03, 2003 02:27 PM 
> Hello Dom,
> Unfortunately, we do not have any information on whether or not the BIOS will 
> be updated to resolve the issue you are having with the ACPI. This is up to 
> the IBM Software Developers.
>  
> Thank you for choosing the IBM Forums.
>  
>  
>  Theresa L. IBM World-Wide Electronic Support and Services
> ---------------------
> 
> 2.) thats the reply to my email sent to IBM technical support:
> 
> --------------------
> Dear Mr. Bar,
> you have contacted the technical support of IBM and we can't give you
> marketing informations about future equipment. Please call our service
> centre at 01803 - 31 32 33 and ask for someone who is able to inform you
> about that.
> 
> Best regards
> Your IBM eSupport
> 
> 
> 
>                          IBM Personal Computing Division
>                          http://www.ibm.com/pc/support
> --------------------
> 
> I will try to contact a developer at IBM ...
> 
> Greetings,
> Dom

-- 
Arndt Schoenewald <abs-SA7OhAOe25xnNxvc45mVi0K323yFvGpRdefyYXQ/eNw@public.gmane.org>, Software Developer
Quelltext AG (http://www.quelltext-ag.de), Dortmund, Germany


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems
@ 2003-01-05  0:09 Dom
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dom @ 2003-01-05  0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mantel-l3A5Bk7waGM; +Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

Dear Hubert!

According to the Linux ACPI developers the IBM Thinkpad A31 has a buggy BIOS. 
Recently I have heard/read rumors that SuSE is cooperating with IBM 
concercing the ACPI implementation of Thinkpad notebooks. There seem to be 
many Thinkpad owners having the same problem with ACPI support. 
Today I have tested your SuSE kernel (suse-2.4.19-41 [20030103]) hoping that 
ACPI might work. ;-) Could you please inform us what the status of the 
cooperation with IBM at SuSE is? Are there any efforts at IBM to fix the 
buggy BIOS or at SuSE to implement a work around for the buggy bios? Any 
information is highly appreciated!

Best Regards,
Dom


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-05  0:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-01 14:55 IBM Thinkpad A31 | ACPI problems Dom
     [not found] ` <200301011555.06058.dom-K271P2BsTd0@public.gmane.org>
2003-01-02 17:29   ` Adachi, Kenichi
     [not found]     ` <000301c2b284$8a15d8f0$232202d3-F8JvWDuGsZU@public.gmane.org>
2003-01-02 20:25       ` Dom
2003-01-02 21:31         ` PSI-Systems
     [not found]           ` <004701c2b2a6$434732d0$0201a8c0-kjWjS56XVej+Hn7q9Vec/7NAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
2003-01-02 21:54             ` Dom
     [not found]               ` <200301022254.55856.dom-K271P2BsTd0@public.gmane.org>
2002-02-02 22:20                 ` AW: " Jörg Hänsel
2003-01-04 10:53                 ` Dom
     [not found]                   ` <200301041153.42326.dom-K271P2BsTd0@public.gmane.org>
2003-01-04 15:51                     ` Arndt Schoenewald
2003-01-02 20:27       ` Thomas Geiger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-05  0:09 Dom
2003-01-01 13:45 Dom
     [not found] ` <200301011445.31369.dom-K271P2BsTd0@public.gmane.org>
2003-01-01 14:13   ` Adachi, Kenichi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox