From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for 2.4.21-pre2 and acpi-20021212 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 18:42:20 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030107174219.GA893@zaurus> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030103222354.00ae1aa0@pop.t-online.de> <20030106175205.GC374@poup.poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030106175205.GC374-j6u/t2rXLliUoIHC/UFpr9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Ducrot Bruno Cc: Margit Schubert-While , "Grover, Andrew" , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Looking on the Intel site, however shows a Windows > > tool for getting this info. Hmmm. > > A quick squint at the DSDT shows some suspicious > > "if windows" tests. Hmmm. > > Is the ACPI table only releasing this info for Windows ? > > I really would like to know how my P4 is cooking :-) > > I guess an EC SMB driver that (still) need to be written for Linux. > That should be for the lm-sensors team, I think. I guess relying on lm-sensors team is bad idea. They have enough work, already; and basic lm-sensors support is in 2.5.54, so you should be able to develop against Linus' tree. Pavel -- Pavel Written on sharp zaurus, because my Velo1 broke. If you have Velo you don't need... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com