* kacpidpc needs to die
@ 2003-01-07 18:51 Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2003-01-07 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ACPI mailing list, kernel list, Andrew Grover
Hi!
For reasons discussed before [forking from timer is not safe, anyway],
kacpidpc needs to die. Andrew, are you going to kill it or should I do
it?
Pavel
--
Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net.
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* RE: kacpidpc needs to die
@ 2003-01-08 18:57 Grover, Andrew
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Grover, Andrew @ 2003-01-08 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek, ACPI mailing list, kernel list
> From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org]
> For reasons discussed before [forking from timer is not safe, anyway],
> kacpidpc needs to die. Andrew, are you going to kill it or should I do
> it?
I can kill it...let me just verify with you --
acpi_os_queue_for_execution has a two block switch statement, just use
the first block (the case that uses schedule_work) and delete the rest,
yes?
Thanks -- Regards -- Andy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-08 18:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-07 18:51 kacpidpc needs to die Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-08 18:57 Grover, Andrew
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox