From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: RE: thermal.o Linux ACPI Kernel Modul Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 19:46:26 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030120184626.GC530@zaurus> References: <20030116113524.GS12516@poup.poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030116113524.GS12516-j6u/t2rXLliUoIHC/UFpr9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Ducrot Bruno Cc: fat32-S0/GAf8tV78@public.gmane.org, acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > > cat trip_points > > > critical (S5): 85 C > > > passive: 95 C: tc1=2 tc2=5 tsp=300 devices=0xc12c7680 > > > > > passive at 95 and critical at 85 ?! Oh my.. I've seen similar crap way too often. Is there something b0rken with Linux or are hw manufacturers really *so* clueless? -- Pavel Written on sharp zaurus, because my Velo1 broke. If you have Velo you don't need... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com