From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Intel ACPI Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:22:51 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030204132251.E16744@suse.de> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030204000748.00b62270@mail.dns-host.com> <20030204094540.GE1205@poup.poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030204094540.GE1205-j6u/t2rXLliUoIHC/UFpr9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>; from ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org on Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:45:40AM +0100 Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Ducrot Bruno Cc: Margit Schubert-While , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:45:40AM +0100, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > > So, What do you think about this (D845): > Nothing, apart that it will not work reliability with Linux or > any flavour of free *BSD. I wonder if it's worth allowing the user to override \_OS at boottime. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com