From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Weirdness in arch/i386/kernel/acpi_wakeup.S Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:09:28 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030210170928.GD443@elf.ucw.cz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Bjorn Wesen Cc: ACPI mailing list List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > The acpi.c code in the same directory insists on wakeup_end - wakeup_start > being less than a page big, but in the .S file, the org statements force > them to be at least 3 pages apart :) (2.5.59 with latest ACPI patches) > > It seems to work anyway because the relevant _code_ is in the beginning and > is thus copied into the low page anyway during S3 suspend, but there is a > reference to a wakeup_stack and it all looks a bit funny, not to mention > the big warning message "will crash upon attempt to suspend".. can anyone > say how this code is supposed to work and I'll dive into it :) Well, it seems that code needs to get smaller... > (The problem I'm having is that the console VGA is not re-initialized upon > coming back from an S3 suspend and I am trying to debug that) Have you tried acpi_sleep=s3_bios and acpi_sleep=s3_mode (not yet in 2.5.59, but already in 2.5.59-acpi?) Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com