* Why don't use C2/C3 with high latency?
@ 2003-03-28 18:22 Ruediger Otte
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ruediger Otte @ 2003-03-28 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
Hi,
on my system (Gigabyte GA-7VTXH, VIA KT266A Chipset, Athlon XP 1600+)
the C2 processor powerstate have not been enabled until I set the
ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_C2_LATENCY to a value above 100. The system runs
quite normal after this change and consumes much less power than before.
Also the processor temperature goes down from 48°C to under 35°C when
idle.
So why is the MAX_C2_LATENCY set to this value? Is it possible to
optimize the use of this high latency C2 to only use it when the system
is _really_ idle?
--
Rüdiger
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-03-28 18:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-28 18:22 Why don't use C2/C3 with high latency? Ruediger Otte
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox