From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4.22? Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:31:24 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030404093123.GA311@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20030403140709.75be5865.hanno@gmx.de> <1049378019.1769.24.camel@darkstar.portugal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1049378019.1769.24.camel-4/PLUo9XfK/yXfm4dIG/yWZHpeb/A1Y/@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: S Cc: Hanno =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=F6ck?= , acpi-devel List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > This has already been discussed, and for "Marcelo team " is a to big > patch to be included in kernel tree. I had thought about an solution, I > think that Andrew Grover has reason. > What we need to do, is prove that the code that not is under > drivers/acpi, does not have any effect to others functionality in > kernel, and put acpi has experimental. IDE changes got priority, but I guess we should have good chance getting into 2.4.22. Pavel -- When do you have heart between your knees? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/