From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: failed patch for 2.4.20 Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 17:08:55 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030405160855.GF23430@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20030405155552.GA22362@Tonelli.sns.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030405155552.GA22362-C7jUcIT7jcOb5HrIuDsk0A@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: mennucc1-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 05:55:52PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote: > I tried to apply acpi-20021212-2.4.20.diff.gz > on the kernel sources 2.4.20 that are distributed with Debian; > but I got too many rejects, and indeed compilation fails this is debian's problem, not the acpi list. there is no commitment on the part of the acpi developers to provide patches against any vendor's kernel. p.s. your mail headers are broken, they trim the list from the reply. -- "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies. Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/