From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Zoz Subject: Re: RE: ACPI source releases updated (20030509) Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 15:34:19 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030513133419.GC2217@suse.de> References: <20030513085421.GB1338@enigma.daemon.sh> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 13, Markus Gaugusch wrote: > Another positive aspect of my patch is, that users can keep distribution > kernels and still override their DSDT. SuSE, Mandrake, etc. put a lot of > effort and good patches in their kernels and it is not always easy to > recompile them (at least it's very time consuming because of the huge > number of modules that is usually included). So, dsdt-in-initrd is one > reason less to compile your own kernel (or to be forced to do so). I second that and would like to have that patch included very much. -- ciao, christian -------------------------------------------------------------------- Verglichen mit jedem x-beliebigen Redmonder Betriebssystem-Clone ist Linux geradezu eine leuchtende Perle der Datensicherheit. ------ Frank Rennemann (http://www.linux-knowledge-portal.org) ----- ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com