From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Grundler <iod00d-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: RE: [ACPI] acpi_irq_to_vector()
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 00:13:23 -0700
Sender: linux-ia64-admin-WygotPe7DYIabbyE177sbg@public.gmane.org
Message-ID: <20030623071323.GB592@cup.hp.com>
References: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8427237D@pdsmsx403.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-ia64-admin-WygotPe7DYIabbyE177sbg@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8427237D-4yWAQGcml64gGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
Errors-To: linux-ia64-admin-WygotPe7DYIabbyE177sbg@public.gmane.org
List-Help: <mailto:linux-ia64-request-WygotPe7DYL3TpFAQG+J+JSyx/Wj9/Chdaaq/uiDbmg@public.gmane.org>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-ia64-WygotPe7DYIabbyE177sbg@public.gmane.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxia64.org/lists/listinfo/linux-ia64>,
	<mailto:linux-ia64-request-WygotPe7DYL3TpFAQG+J+EfZv34bSr6CyrRgqdI+6y4@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxia64.org/lists/listinfo/linux-ia64>,
	<mailto:linux-ia64-request-WygotPe7DYL3TpFAQG+J+I4vVymAtk2CuCKOA6ERizqzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxia64.org/archives//linux-ia64/>
To: "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-ia64-WygotPe7DYIabbyE177sbg@public.gmane.org, "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, "Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, "Brown, Len" <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 02:02:08PM +0800, Yu, Luming wrote:
> So I don't think it is reasonable to use pci_dev in acpi_init. 

That's not what willy was proposing.
I understood he was proposing a similar scheme; not to use pci_dev.

grant