From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux-JhLEnvuH02M@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [ACPI] _PDC method in DSDT
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 15:44:49 +0200
Sender: cpufreq-admin-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org
Message-ID: <20030623134449.GC2330@brodo.de>
References: <F760B14C9561B941B89469F59BA3A84725A301@orsmsx401.jf.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <cpufreq-admin-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F760B14C9561B941B89469F59BA3A84725A301-sBd4vmA9Se4Lll3ZsUKC9FDQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
Errors-To: cpufreq-admin-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHW9u/PF5AtMm38Ik5SeuEX72+df2TVCvIA@public.gmane.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHW9u/PF5AtMm4xOcYYyLxz0@public.gmane.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHW9u/PF5AtMmEuNEP1Y2mCuZIoH1IeqzKA@public.gmane.org>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq/>
To: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: David Moore <dcm-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>, "Adachi, Kenichi" <adachi-fvZ7ij+YLgEZc9YY0SgeQc8NsWr+9BEh@public.gmane.org>, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, cpufreq-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 12:11:49AM -0700, Grover, Andrew wrote:
> btw my understanding is that _PDC will be actually in the ACPI spec in
> the near future.

Oh no... a victory for legacy methods... I thought ACPI's philosophy was to
remove legacy code...

	Dominik