From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcibios_scan_acpi() Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:39:05 -0700 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030623213905.GA10992@kroah.com> References: <20030623185901.GN2620@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <16119.20872.104128.965777@napali.hpl.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16119.20872.104128.965777-o/PNRNCSakrWxDs0y9d3MAC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: davidm-sDzT885Ts8HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Cc: Matthew Wilcox , linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 12:14:16PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:59:01 +0100, Matthew Wilcox said: > > Matthew> This patch removes an ifdef from the ia64 acpi patch by > Matthew> defining a new function which takes an acpi_device and a > Matthew> segment/domain as well as the bus number. > > Matthew> I think pcibios_scan_acpi() is an atrocious name. Can > Matthew> someone come up with a better one? > > How about acpi_scan_pci_bus_root()? I agree, that sounds better. greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php