From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [ACPI] MS-6368L ACPI IRQ problem still in 2.4.21 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:26:30 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030624112630.GB451@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20030623221541.GA8096@alf.amelek.gda.pl> <20030623222311.GD25982@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030624054612.GA20235@alf.amelek.gda.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030624054612.GA20235-doiv7TgLjtAqfaPKo25k7GZHpeb/A1Y/@public.gmane.org> To: Marek Michalkiewicz Cc: Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:46:12AM +0200, Marek Michalkiewicz wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:23:11PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Have you patched 2.4.21 with the latest ACPI patch, or is this vanilla > > 2.4.21? > > Vanilla 2.4.21 - tried 2.4.21-ac1 once, but it said Oops at boot time > (something about the VIA686A sound driver - not related to ACPI). The ACPI code in 2.4.21 is something like 18 months old now. It's basically unmaintainable. Fortunately, 2.4.22 should have an ACPI update. -- "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies. Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk