Source organisation

Source organisation

[Matthew Wilcox]

More than once this week I've caught myself wishing for the existance of
an <acpi/pci.h> to put stuff in or to include.  It rather breaks with
the current philosophy of putting all macros in one file, all structs
in another, etc.

What does anyone think?  I'm willing to start moving stuff into a new pci.h
if that'd be acceptable.

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php

Re: Source organisation

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:59:29PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> More than once this week I've caught myself wishing for the existance of
> an <acpi/pci.h> to put stuff in or to include.  It rather breaks with
> the current philosophy of putting all macros in one file, all structs
> in another, etc.
> 
> What does anyone think?  I'm willing to start moving stuff into a new pci.h
> if that'd be acceptable.

If it gets the acpi specific stuff out of include/linux/pci.h I'm all
for it.

thanks,

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php

Re: Source organisation

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> More than once this week I've caught myself wishing for the existance of
> an <acpi/pci.h> to put stuff in or to include.  It rather breaks with
> the current philosophy of putting all macros in one file, all structs
> in another, etc.
> 
> What does anyone think?  I'm willing to start moving stuff into a new pci.h
> if that'd be acceptable.

It would certainly make it more Linux-like
=> yes that would be nice.
				Pavel
-- 
				Pavel
Written on sharp zaurus, because my Velo1 broke. If you have Velo you don't need...



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php