From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: Source organisation Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:52:10 -0700 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030624205210.GA2385@kroah.com> References: <20030624195929.GL451@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030624195929.GL451-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:59:29PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > More than once this week I've caught myself wishing for the existance of > an to put stuff in or to include. It rather breaks with > the current philosophy of putting all macros in one file, all structs > in another, etc. > > What does anyone think? I'm willing to start moving stuff into a new pci.h > if that'd be acceptable. If it gets the acpi specific stuff out of include/linux/pci.h I'm all for it. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php