From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcibios_scan_acpi() Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:10:07 -0700 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030624221007.GA2933@kroah.com> References: <20030623185901.GN2620@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <16119.20872.104128.965777@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20030623213905.GA10992@kroah.com> <20030624213119.GN451@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030624213119.GN451-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: davidm-sDzT885Ts8HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:31:19PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 02:39:05PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > How about acpi_scan_pci_bus_root()? > > > > I agree, that sounds better. > > I think it's too long ... so unless anyone has a better idea, I'm going with > pci_acpi_scan_root(). Here's the patch, presented in patch -p1 format to > make greg's scripts happy ;-) Thanks you :) > ia64 needs to be passed the pci domain and the acpi handle corresponding > to each root bus. Rather than change pcibios_scan_root to take additional > arguments, this patch introduces pci_acpi_scan_root(). Looks good, I've applied it. greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php