From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: EC SCI model? Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030626101610.E74937@root.org> References: <59278FC0C48A994BABABD069571E4568017903D5@orsmsx401.jf.intel.com> <20030626112617.GT19556@poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20030626112617.GT19556-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Ducrot Bruno Cc: "Diefenbaugh, Paul S" , "Grover, Andrew" , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:54:59PM -0700, Diefenbaugh, Paul S wrote: > > I'd echo Andy's recommendation to check out the Linux code. We went > > through quite a bit of wrenching before getting this to work right on > > all of the various ECs - noting that most are incapable of handing > > EC_SCIs in a purely interrupt-driven fashion... > > When you done those tests, it was before the fix which forced the > SCI interrupt to be correctly initialized if not present in firmware > routing last year? > If yes, could you re-consider to redo the tests? Any sign of problems with burst mode? I'm considering whether to enable it for our EC support. -Nate ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php