From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: EC SCI model? Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 13:26:17 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030626112617.GT19556@poupinou.org> References: <59278FC0C48A994BABABD069571E4568017903D5@orsmsx401.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <59278FC0C48A994BABABD069571E4568017903D5-sBd4vmA9Se4Lll3ZsUKC9FDQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Diefenbaugh, Paul S" Cc: "Grover, Andrew" , Nate Lawson , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi Paul, pleased to read you again on this list. On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:54:59PM -0700, Diefenbaugh, Paul S wrote: > I'd echo Andy's recommendation to check out the Linux code. We went > through quite a bit of wrenching before getting this to work right on > all of the various ECs - noting that most are incapable of handing > EC_SCIs in a purely interrupt-driven fashion... When you done those tests, it was before the fix which forced the SCI interrupt to be correctly initialized if not present in firmware routing last year? If yes, could you re-consider to redo the tests? Cheers, -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php