From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: EC SCI model? Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:45:43 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030701124543.GL7796@poupinou.org> References: <59278FC0C48A994BABABD069571E4568017903FB@orsmsx401.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <59278FC0C48A994BABABD069571E4568017903FB-sBd4vmA9Se4Lll3ZsUKC9FDQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Diefenbaugh, Paul S" Cc: "Grover, Andrew" , Nate Lawson , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 02:16:16PM -0700, Diefenbaugh, Paul S wrote: > > When you done those tests, it was before the fix which forced the > > SCI interrupt to be correctly initialized if not present in firmware > > routing last year? > > Our original implementation was done on the BeOS several years ago; then > ported to Linux. I believe the problem is unrelated to the SCI issue > you've mentioned (an EC hardware bug). > Is it possible then to get a fully interrupt-driven EC driver, but fallback to polling via acpi blacklist? -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01