Re: Compaq Evo 510SFF and ACPI

Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-07-04T12:47:40Z

Scott Duplichan <sduplichan-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:

>
> I believe the problem is that 'saved_rsdt' is smaller than the EVO rsdt.
> If I am looking at the correct source code, the maximum number of
> tables supported is ACPI_TABLE_COUNT, which is 17. That number is
> based on the assumption that there is at most one table of each type.
> But that assumption is not valid for the EVO 510, because it has many
> SSDT tables, for a total of 21 tables.
>

Do basically changing the constant and recompiling might solve things?

> --
> Scott

--
Alexander Hoogerhuis | alexh-rpjHciJLgqZBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org
CCNP - CCDP - MCNE - CCSE | +47 908 21 485
"You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it." --Scott McNealy