From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: /sys/firmware/acpi/namespace/
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 19:46:38 +0200
Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Message-ID: <20030705174638.GR7796@poupinou.org>
References: <20030704213746.GM23597@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030705142520.GK7796@poupinou.org> <20030705152100.GO23597@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030705152427.GP7796@poupinou.org> <20030705163221.GP23597@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030705163221.GP23597-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
List-Help: <mailto:acpi-devel-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5utDmRdBvX5/5lLLH9aP38KF1pqr+6INuaA@public.gmane.org>
List-Post: <mailto:acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel>,
	<mailto:acpi-devel-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5utDmRdBvX5/5R9m/fhtKvoLKtGCp0j7rLg@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel>,
	<mailto:acpi-devel-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5utDmRdBvX5/5ji9XKYC2TYK4Io4DoRGLOrNAH6kLmebB@public.gmane.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=acpi-devel>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 05:32:21PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 05:24:27PM +0200, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 04:21:00PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 04:25:20PM +0200, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> > > > I guess it is a sysfs bug because it worked.
> > > 
> > 
> > The /sys/.../acpi/namespace worked.  I don't think that nobody touched
> > the code for acpi.  Then I think it is a sysfs bug.
> 
> Ah, now I understand.  Do you happen to remember what version it used
> to work in?  I've got two boxes running 2.5.7[34] (one i386, one ia64)
> and neither show anything but directories under /sys/firmware/acpi
> 

Sorry.  I have not understood your first question.
Nothing but directories under /sys/firmware/acpi.
For now, ACPI default attributes still have to be written.

-- 
Ducrot Bruno

--  Which is worse:  ignorance or apathy?
--  Don't know.  Don't care.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01