From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivan Gyurdiev Subject: Re: 2.5.75 - ACPI and sound lockups Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 06:02:49 -0400 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <200307130602.49710.ivg2@cornell.edu> References: Reply-To: ivg2-HmMyXyqgL2CVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: hgfelger-9nAOAgdJVo4b1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org, liste-9nAOAgdJVo4b1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 13 July 2003 06:43, liste-9nAOAgdJVo4b1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org wrote: > Salut Ivan, salut > my first look says, that IRQ 3,7,10 and 11 (which is the one, that bit > you, I think) has to be level and not edge. > As irq 11 is shared, this is no good! > > May you please get the information you provided for 2.5.74 for the > 2.4-kernel you mentioned, too (including ACPI-version from > /proc/acpi/info)? You mean the 2.4 kernels, which I mentioned work fine? Every 2.4 kernel I've tried with ACPI works ok (that's the 2.4 in-kernel code, no patches). Should I try the latest 2.4 kernel? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1