From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew de Quincey Subject: Re: RE: Discussion: ACPI selective IRQ blacklist Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 02:47:03 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <200309040247.03418.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net> References: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017304AF00@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017304AF00-exJ48ZlmiLrcnAH0NVKmOFDQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Nakajima, Jun" , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-acpi List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 04 September 2003 02:19, Nakajima, Jun wrote: > I think acpi-picmode is reasonable and probably it would work more > reliably compared with APIC mode, but the behavior is triggered by > "noapic" (i.e. boot parameter). It was broken for ACPI, but Len has > fixed it. > > Which VIA motherboards should be listed in the blacklist? Quite a lot, thats the problem unfortunately. I have a much better idea for a patch to work round this issue, but I don't know for sure until I implement it. Tell you what, I'll implement and send it to you and the list... then you can decide whether it should be in ACPI or not. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf