public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core-yWtbtysYrB+LZ21kGMrzwg@public.gmane.org>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux-JhLEnvuH02M@public.gmane.org>
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	andrew.grover-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	cpufreq-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [ACPI] [PATCHES] ACPI Processor update [idle, throttling, thermal, cpufreq]
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 00:23:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200309050023.06761.dtor_core@ameritech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030904222434.GC6350-JhLEnvuH02M@public.gmane.org>

Dominik,

I have couple of concerns regarding P-states IO library, esp. 
acpi_processor_get_frequency. It seems that ACPI does not allow
to read current state without setting it first, at least with
the following code on my notebook I was always getting garbage 
in the status register:

+static int
+acpi_processor_get_current_state(
+       struct acpi_processor_performance       *perf)
+{
+       int     result = 0;
+       int     i;
+       u8      value;
+
+       ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_processor_get_current_state");
+
+       if (!perf->pr->flags.performance)
+               goto out;
+
+       value = inb(perf->status_register);
+
+       ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
+               "Got 0x%02x from port 0x%04x\n", value, perf->status_register));
+
+       for (i = 0; i < perf->state_count; i++) {
+               if (value == (u8) perf->states[i].status) {
+                       perf->state = i;
+                       goto out;
+               }
+       }
+
+       /* couldn't match our state table - garbage in status register */
+       ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_ERROR,
+               "Bad data 0x%02x in performance status register 0x%04x\n",
+               value, perf->status_register));
+       result = -EFAULT;
+out:
+       return_VALUE(result);
+}

I am wondering is it just me, my code or general deficiency.

Also, do you really need to do notify_transition twice 
(acpi_processor_set_performance)?

Dmitry

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-05  5:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-04 22:24 [PATCHES] ACPI Processor update [idle,throttling,thermal,cpufreq] Dominik Brodowski
     [not found] ` <20030904222434.GC6350-JhLEnvuH02M@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-05  5:23   ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
     [not found]     ` <200309050023.06761.dtor_core-yWtbtysYrB+LZ21kGMrzwg@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-05  6:52       ` [ACPI] [PATCHES] ACPI Processor update [idle, throttling, thermal, cpufreq] Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-08 13:29   ` Pavel Machek
     [not found]     ` <20030908132939.GD3944-u08AdweFZfgxtPtxi4kahqVXKuFTiq87@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-09 17:21       ` linux-JhLEnvuH02M
     [not found]         ` <20030909172135.GA4106-JhLEnvuH02M@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-09 23:13           ` Pavel Machek
     [not found]             ` <20030909231303.GH211-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-09 23:29               ` linux-JhLEnvuH02M
     [not found]                 ` <20030909232916.GA9561-JhLEnvuH02M@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-10  0:00                   ` Pavel Machek
     [not found]                     ` <20030910000041.GC217-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-10  0:17                       ` [PATCH] acpi 2.6: consistent user-forced throttling (9/8) [Was: Re: [PATCHES] ACPI Processor update [idle, throttling, thermal, cpufreq]] linux-JhLEnvuH02M
     [not found]                         ` <20030910001716.GA10324-JhLEnvuH02M@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-10 10:54                           ` Nils Faerber
     [not found]                             ` <1063191264.23733.1320.camel-65LrUGLyukAb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-10 12:53                               ` linux-JhLEnvuH02M

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200309050023.06761.dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --to=dtor_core-ywtbtysyrb+lz21kgmrzwg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=andrew.grover-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cpufreq-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-JhLEnvuH02M@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox