From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux-JhLEnvuH02M@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: [ACPI] [PATCHES] ACPI Processor update [idle, throttling, thermal, cpufreq] Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 19:21:35 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-bounces-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030909172135.GA4106@brodo.de> References: <20030904222434.GC6350@brodo.de> <20030908132939.GD3944@openzaurus.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030908132939.GD3944-u08AdweFZfgxtPtxi4kahqVXKuFTiq87@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, andrew.grover-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, cpufreq-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi Pavel, Glad you liked [at least parts] of my patches. On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:29:40PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > http://www.brodo.de/cpufreq_tmp/acpi-2.6.0-test4-processor_thermal_throttling > > Move throttling into its own submodule, and register it with the new > > passive cooling module. Also, the now-useless "limit" interface is > > removed. > > > > Actually I liked to be able to echo 0:7 > limit and conserve battery/ > make sure machine does not overheat with it... echo 7 > throttling should do the same thing. However, don't expect any battey conservation if ACPI C2 throttling works, and to set custom levels against "overheating" there's a write access to /proc/acpi/thermal/*/trip_points too... Dominik