From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [ACPI] [PATCHES] ACPI Processor update [idle, throttling, thermal, cpufreq] Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 02:00:41 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-bounces-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030910000041.GC217@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20030904222434.GC6350@brodo.de> <20030908132939.GD3944@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <20030909172135.GA4106@brodo.de> <20030909231303.GH211@elf.ucw.cz> <20030909232916.GA9561@brodo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030909232916.GA9561-JhLEnvuH02M@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org To: linux-JhLEnvuH02M@public.gmane.org Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, andrew.grover-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, cpufreq-1walMZg8u8rXmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > > > http://www.brodo.de/cpufreq_tmp/acpi-2.6.0-test4-processor_thermal_throttling > > > > > Move throttling into its own submodule, and register it with the new > > > > > passive cooling module. Also, the now-useless "limit" interface is > > > > > removed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually I liked to be able to echo 0:7 > limit and conserve battery/ > > > > make sure machine does not overheat with it... > > > > > > echo 7 > throttling should do the same thing. > > > > Will not first change in thermal system unthrottle it for me, behind > > my back? > > Well yes, it might, if the temperature had been higher than the passive > cooling trip point. If you want me to, I'll change the behaviour so that the > /proc/acpi/.../throttling input is consistent (minimum limit) until the user > choses a different throttling level. Yes I guess that would make sense. Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]