IBM success ... but partial

IBM success ... but partial

[Hrvoje Habjanic]

Hi!

After disabling actual deallocation of memory in ACPI, laptop booted!! And i 
got working shell ... nice. But:

sh-2.05b# cat /proc/interrupts
           CPU0
  0:      49587          XT-PIC  timer
  1:          2          XT-PIC  keyboard
  2:          0          XT-PIC  cascade
  4:       1519          XT-PIC  serial
  8:          1          XT-PIC  rtc
  9:         18          XT-PIC  acpi
 14:        947          XT-PIC  ide0
 15:          2          XT-PIC  ide1
NMI:          0
LOC:          0
ERR:          0
MIS:          0


huh?

sh-2.05b# cat /proc/acpi/power_resource/PUBS/state
state:                   on
system level:            S3
order:                   0
reference count:         0

(is this ok?)

sh-2.05b# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU/info
processor id:            0
acpi id:                 1
bus mastering control:   yes
power management:        yes
throttling control:      yes
performance management:  yes
limit interface:         yes

sh-2.05b# cat /proc/acpi/embedded_controller/EC/info
gpe bit:                 0x1c
ports:                   0x66, 0x62
use global lock:         no


AND FAN IS NOT DETECTED???

So, what next? Write to IBM?

H.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: IBM success ... but partial

[Lu Tong]

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:19:21PM +0200, Hrvoje Habjanic wrote:
> 
> AND FAN IS NOT DETECTED???

acpi doesn't detect anything, it merely lists/controls stuff found in its tables. Fan is not listed in the DSDT table of IBM bios.

--ltong


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: IBM success ... but partial

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> After disabling actual deallocation of memory in ACPI, laptop booted!! And i 
> got working shell ... nice. But:
> 
> sh-2.05b# cat /proc/interrupts
>            CPU0
>   0:      49587          XT-PIC  timer
>   1:          2          XT-PIC  keyboard
>   2:          0          XT-PIC  cascade
>   4:       1519          XT-PIC  serial
>   8:          1          XT-PIC  rtc
>   9:         18          XT-PIC  acpi
>  14:        947          XT-PIC  ide0
>  15:          2          XT-PIC  ide1
> NMI:          0
> LOC:          0
> ERR:          0
> MIS:          0
> 
> 
> huh?

Why huh?

> sh-2.05b# cat /proc/acpi/power_resource/PUBS/state
> state:                   on
> system level:            S3
> order:                   0
> reference count:         0
> 
> (is this ok?)

Should not this be S0?

> AND FAN IS NOT DETECTED???

Thats okay if hw handles the fan.
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: IBM success ... but partial

[Hrvoje Habjanic]

> > sh-2.05b# cat /proc/interrupts
> >            CPU0
> >   0:      49587          XT-PIC  timer
> >   1:          2          XT-PIC  keyboard
> >   2:          0          XT-PIC  cascade
> >   4:       1519          XT-PIC  serial
> >   8:          1          XT-PIC  rtc
> >   9:         18          XT-PIC  acpi
> >  14:        947          XT-PIC  ide0
> >  15:          2          XT-PIC  ide1
> > NMI:          0
> > LOC:          0
> > ERR:          0
> > MIS:          0
> >
> >
> > huh?
>
> Why huh?

1. Shouldn't instead of XT-PIC type interrupts be routed through IO-APIC? UP APIC 
is enabled ... but, i guess, something other is in error here ... 'will check it ...

>
> > sh-2.05b# cat /proc/acpi/power_resource/PUBS/state
> > state:                   on
> > system level:            S3
> > order:                   0
> > reference count:         0
> >
> > (is this ok?)
>
> Should not this be S0?

I think it should ... but it isn't ... odd ...

> > AND FAN IS NOT DETECTED???
>
> Thats okay if hw handles the fan.

Yep, it seems that way ...

Generaly, this is working, but im not shure that it is working as it should.
More testing needed ...

Anhow, i hope this help ... :-)

H.


p.s. Everything is on http://free-zg.hinet.hr/HrvojeHabjanic/acpi/IBM_ThinkPad_R40 
(it will be in a short time ...)


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf