From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] acpi-20030916-2.6.0-pre5.diff Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 06:12:00 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20030919041200.GA7666@wotan.suse.de> References: <20030823150219.21c951aa.akpm@osdl.org> <1063926206.2680.200.camel@linux.local> <20030918155715.61a41697.akpm@osdl.org> <20030919011149.GB20844@wotan.suse.de> <1063942898.2676.391.camel@linux.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1063942898.2676.391.camel-Tk/TtsB/rErDOqzlkpFKJg@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Len Brown Cc: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:41:38PM -0400, Brown, Len wrote: > Andi, > Good hunting! > > This fix has been integrated with others in the ACPI patch, > and is available now in these bitkeeper trees: > > http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net/linux-acpi-test-2.4.22 > http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net/linux-acpi-test-2.4.23 > http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net/linux-acpi-test-2.6.0 I think you could at least push this one directly to Andrew/Linus without testing it in a separate tree first. It is an quite obvious fix with no risk to break anything. -Andi ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf