* bug report: multi-byte access in indexfields broken
@ 2003-09-21 20:05 Robert Vollmert
[not found] ` <20030921200525.GB2968-duT3ICHXG/I@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert Vollmert @ 2003-09-21 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
Hello,
it appears the problems I mailed about earlier are due to a bug in the
ACPI code. Reading from multi-byte fields in a ByteAccess-IndexField
seems to be broken.
When I replace
IndexField (EIND, EDAT, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
{
Offset (0x10),
IKFG, 8,
FRPN, 16,
RAMB, 32,
AVOL, 8,
...
}
Method (CRMB, 0, NotSerialized)
{
Return (RAMB)
}
with
IndexField (EIND, EDAT, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
{
Offset (0x10),
IKFG, 8,
FRPN, 16,
RAM0, 8,
RAM1, 8,
RAM2, 8,
RAM3, 8,
AVOL, 8,
...
}
Method (CRMB, 0, NotSerialized)
{
Store (RAM3, Local0)
ShiftLeft (Local0, 0x8, Local0)
Add (RAM2, Local0, Local0)
ShiftLeft (Local0, 0x8, Local0)
Add (RAM1, Local0, Local0)
ShiftLeft (Local0, 0x8, Local0)
Add (RAM0, Local0, Local0)
Return (Local0)
}
the first version of CRMB computes 0x64646464, while the second
version computes the correct 0x0F750064. The least byte seems to just
be copied to the other positions.
Cheers
Robert
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: <20030921200525.GB2968-duT3ICHXG/I@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: bug report: multi-byte access in indexfields broken [not found] ` <20030921200525.GB2968-duT3ICHXG/I@public.gmane.org> @ 2003-09-21 20:16 ` Robert Vollmert 2003-09-22 14:02 ` Ducrot Bruno 2003-09-22 17:29 ` bug report: multi-byte access in indexfields broken [patch] Robert Vollmert 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Robert Vollmert @ 2003-09-21 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f > it appears the problems I mailed about earlier are due to a bug in the > ACPI code. Reading from multi-byte fields in a ByteAccess-IndexField > seems to be broken. That's with Linux 2.4.22 + ACPI 20030916 + DSDT patch. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: bug report: multi-byte access in indexfields broken [not found] ` <20030921200525.GB2968-duT3ICHXG/I@public.gmane.org> 2003-09-21 20:16 ` Robert Vollmert @ 2003-09-22 14:02 ` Ducrot Bruno 2003-09-22 17:29 ` bug report: multi-byte access in indexfields broken [patch] Robert Vollmert 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Ducrot Bruno @ 2003-09-22 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Vollmert; +Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:05:25PM +0200, Robert Vollmert wrote: > Hello, > > it appears the problems I mailed about earlier are due to a bug in the > ACPI code. Reading from multi-byte fields in a ByteAccess-IndexField > seems to be broken. > > When I replace > > IndexField (EIND, EDAT, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve) > { > Offset (0x10), > IKFG, 8, > FRPN, 16, > RAMB, 32, > AVOL, 8, > ... > } > > Method (CRMB, 0, NotSerialized) > { > Return (RAMB) > } > After some testing, I found that this bug happens with word access as well, and only when the field is not aligned with 8 (in case of dword), which do not make sence as a buggy ASL due to the ByteAcc. I consider that bug being critical. I'm not sure if that happens for other types other than Index one (that piece of code being shared between 4 kind of OR). Anyway, most of use done by IndexField is to access CMOS data. I prefer not to think what happens if a write is done, and if the write is buggy as well. -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: bug report: multi-byte access in indexfields broken [patch] [not found] ` <20030921200525.GB2968-duT3ICHXG/I@public.gmane.org> 2003-09-21 20:16 ` Robert Vollmert 2003-09-22 14:02 ` Ducrot Bruno @ 2003-09-22 17:29 ` Robert Vollmert 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Robert Vollmert @ 2003-09-22 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f Here's a patch. --- exfldio.c.orig 2003-09-22 18:22:09.000000000 +0200 +++ exfldio.c 2003-09-22 19:16:11.000000000 +0200 @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ { acpi_status status; acpi_integer local_value; + acpi_integer index_field_value; ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE_U32 ("ex_field_datum_io", field_datum_byte_offset); @@ -448,18 +449,22 @@ case ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_INDEX_FIELD: + /* Compute index value to access the current datum */ + + index_field_value = (acpi_integer) obj_desc->index_field.value + + field_datum_byte_offset; /* Ensure that the index_value is not beyond the capacity of the register */ if (acpi_ex_register_overflow (obj_desc->index_field.index_obj, - (acpi_integer) obj_desc->index_field.value)) { + index_field_value)) { return_ACPI_STATUS (AE_AML_REGISTER_LIMIT); } /* Write the index value to the index_register (itself a region_field) */ status = acpi_ex_insert_into_field (obj_desc->index_field.index_obj, - &obj_desc->index_field.value, + &index_field_value, sizeof (obj_desc->index_field.value)); if (ACPI_FAILURE (status)) { return_ACPI_STATUS (status); ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-22 17:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-21 20:05 bug report: multi-byte access in indexfields broken Robert Vollmert
[not found] ` <20030921200525.GB2968-duT3ICHXG/I@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-21 20:16 ` Robert Vollmert
2003-09-22 14:02 ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-09-22 17:29 ` bug report: multi-byte access in indexfields broken [patch] Robert Vollmert
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox