From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karol Kozimor Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: [BK PATCH] ACPI 20030918 Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 00:56:41 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20031001225641.GB18451@hell.org.pl> References: <1064986198.2574.190.camel@dhcppc4> <3F7B0B86.70206@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F7B0B86.70206-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Len Brown , Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Thus wrote Jeff Garzik: > > (03/09/30 1.1381) > > [ACPI] acpi4asus-0.25-0.26.diff (Karol Kozimor) > > > > (03/09/30 1.1380) > > [ACPI] acpi4asus-0.24a-0.25-2.6.0-test (Karol Kozimor) > > > > All the comments were quite descriptive except for these... a filename > doesn't me much about the content of the patch. Well, as for me, I posted ChangeLog excerpts in the original announcements. The problem is those patches went in after the third or fourth resend, which took some 1.5 month. I'll try to post the ChangeLog in the resends though. Best regards, -- Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor sziwan-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org