From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nate Lawson Subject: RE: Store(Local0, Local0) behavior? Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:01:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20031003180107.Y92654@root.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Moore, Robert" Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Thank you! Here's a snippet of ASL from my BP6: Scope(\_SI_) { Method(_MSG, 1) { Store(Local0, Local0) } -Nate On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Moore, Robert wrote: > I will re-address this issue (in the case where Local0 is > uninitialized.) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nate Lawson [mailto:nate-Y6VGUYTwhu0@public.gmane.org] > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 12:50 PM > To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > Cc: Moore, Robert > Subject: Store(Local0, Local0) behavior? > > Sometime around 0619, executing an opcode of Store(Local0, Local0) > started > generating an error instead of just being a no-op. In reading the 2.0b > spec, there is no evidence that this is an illegal operation. Could > someone restore the previous behavior? What part of ACPICA handles the > Store opcode? > > -Nate > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf