From: Nate Lawson <nate-Y6VGUYTwhu0@public.gmane.org>
To: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: \_PR\CPU\_INI not called during initialization
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:50:26 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031006144829.Y3803@root.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D3A3AA459175A44CB5326F26DA7A189C1C3DDA-sBd4vmA9Se58QrAoInS571DQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
Since in ACPI 2.0 a processor declaration block can be under \_SB_, it
counts as a device. If you don't want this in ACPICA, I'll stick it under
our Processor driver.
-Nate
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Moore, Robert wrote:
> _INI methods are only called on objects of type "Device", as per the
> ACPI specification.
> Bob
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nate Lawson [mailto:nate-Y6VGUYTwhu0@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:47 AM
> To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> Cc: Moore, Robert
> Subject: \_PR\CPU\_INI not called during initialization
>
> My laptop has two performance states I have been using, however, I get a
> 0
> when I read the mhz and mW associated with each state. When running
> with
> debug = ACPI_LV_INIT, I noticed that the processor's _INI method is not
> called and this is what fills out the Px info. Is this something you'll
> add to ACPICA or should I be handling that myself?
>
> http://root.org/~nate/acpi/ibm-acpidump.asl.gz
>
> -Nate
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-06 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-06 18:15 \_PR\CPU\_INI not called during initialization Moore, Robert
[not found] ` <D3A3AA459175A44CB5326F26DA7A189C1C3DDA-sBd4vmA9Se58QrAoInS571DQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
2003-10-06 21:50 ` Nate Lawson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-06 22:58 Moore, Robert
2003-10-06 22:33 Moore, Robert
[not found] ` <D3A3AA459175A44CB5326F26DA7A189C1C3DE0-sBd4vmA9Se58QrAoInS571DQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
2003-10-06 22:55 ` Nate Lawson
2003-10-06 16:47 Nate Lawson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031006144829.Y3803@root.org \
--to=nate-y6vguytwhu0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox