From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nate Lawson Subject: RE: \_PR\CPU\_INI not called during initialization Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20031006144829.Y3803@root.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Moore, Robert" Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Since in ACPI 2.0 a processor declaration block can be under \_SB_, it counts as a device. If you don't want this in ACPICA, I'll stick it under our Processor driver. -Nate On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Moore, Robert wrote: > _INI methods are only called on objects of type "Device", as per the > ACPI specification. > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nate Lawson [mailto:nate-Y6VGUYTwhu0@public.gmane.org] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:47 AM > To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > Cc: Moore, Robert > Subject: \_PR\CPU\_INI not called during initialization > > My laptop has two performance states I have been using, however, I get a > 0 > when I read the mhz and mW associated with each state. When running > with > debug = ACPI_LV_INIT, I noticed that the processor's _INI method is not > called and this is what fills out the Px info. Is this something you'll > add to ACPICA or should I be handling that myself? > > http://root.org/~nate/acpi/ibm-acpidump.asl.gz > > -Nate > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf