Re: broken bm_sts on 82801CA?

[Nate Lawson <nate-Y6VGUYTwhu0@public.gmane.org>]

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:10:37AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:38:07PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > > My chipset claims to be: Intel 82801CA/CAM (ICH3) and it's on an IBM T23
> > > > thinkpad.  While testing my Cx driver, I noticed that bm_sts is always
> > > > set, even when I clear it by writing a 1 to the register.  I _know_ the
> > > > box is idle so I believe this bit to be broken.  Can anyone confirm this?
> > > > I noticed the errata probe for the PIIX4 but I don't think it covers my
> > > > part.
> > >
> > > Have you any kind of usb bus support compiled in your kernel?
> > > If yes, try without.
> >
> > Ah, I'll try that.  I do have USB support compiled in.  This is on
> > FreeBSD, btw.
>
> That more an hardware design issue due to how hotplug work in usb busses
> in general, and it may need to be workaround, so if anybody haven't yet worked on
> C-states on FreeBSD..  Please note also that Linux do not workaround that
> btw.

I have implemented C-states in freebsd, that's how I ran into this
problem.  I'll be committing the code once it's cleaned up a little.

Since Linux always demotes to "don't enter a Cx state" if bm_sts indicates
activity, are you saying that if you have a USB bus configured in Linux,
you don't even use C1 (HLT)?

-Nate


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php