From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: Bitfield usage in FADT table? Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:47:43 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20031111204743.GO29175@poupinou.org> References: <20031111161527.GC23128@sh.epita.fr> <20031111170245.GE29175@poupinou.org> <20031111171845.GA19024@dabelg.epita.fr> <20031111175730.GG29175@poupinou.org> <20031111182522.GA19215@dabelg.epita.fr> <20031111185717.GH29175@poupinou.org> <20031111202613.GA25458@sh.epita.fr> <20031111203433.GN29175@poupinou.org> <20031111204627.GA26007@sh.epita.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031111204627.GA26007-AroONJ29hSVWj0EZb7rXcA@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: max-ZrNlpQwM5lQ@public.gmane.org Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:46:27PM +0100, maximE bizon wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:34:33PM +0100, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > > > Ahem, I got success with 2.5.7x, or so. > > > > I think also that I got success with 2.6.0-testX, but I don't remember > > when it broke (should be for X=5 IIRC) even without the 'faulty' drivers. > > Did it work for an X200 or for another laptop? > For another laptop. Well, I supposed you had understood. Sorry for confusion. -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/