Re: Bitfield usage in FADT table?

Ducrot Bruno
2003-11-11T17:02:45Z

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:15:28PM +0100, maxime bizon wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using kernel 2.6.0-test9 on a i386 notebook.
>
> I forced a new FADT table in the kernel and put the following bytes at
> offset 0x70: 0xf1 0xa2 0x35 0x78.
>
> Then I made some printk at kernel init and here is the output:
>
> begin dump of fadt:
> [...]
> 6e 0
> 6f 0
> 70 f1
> 71 a2
> 72 35
> 73 78
> 74 0
> 75 0
> [...]
> bit wb_invd is 1
> bit wb_invd_flush is 0
> bit proc_c1 is 0
> bit plvl2_up is 0
> bit pwr_button is 1
> bit sleep_button is 1
> bit fixed_rTC is 1
> bit rtcs4 is 1
> bit tmr_val_ext is 0
> bit dock_cap is 1
> bit reset_reg_sup is 0
> bit sealed_case is 0
> bit headless is 0
> bit cpu_sw_sleep is 1
>
> gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.3 give the same thing.
>
>
> Is it really what it is supposed to be?

To be what? What you want to do, exactly?

--
Ducrot Bruno

-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
-- Don't know. Don't care.