Re: Bitfield usage in FADT table?

maximE bizon
2003-11-11T17:48:02Z

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:23:16AM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:

> It can be confusing, can't it?
>
> Yes, I think that they are correct.
> Look at the bit field as a u32: it's value is 0x7835a2f1.
>
> Now look at the bit numbers in that u32 value and assign bit field
> names to them and it will match your list above.

Yes, my mistake.

Thanks.

--
Maxime