* [Fwd: [PATCH] Don't save state in ACPI on shutdown/reboot]
@ 2003-11-11 16:23 Len Brown
[not found] ` <1068567824.24982.21.camel-D2Zvc0uNKG8@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2003-11-11 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ACPI Developers
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Forwarded message - [PATCH] Don't save state in ACPI on shutdown/reboot --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3739 bytes --]
From: Andi Kleen <ak-h9bWGtP8wOw@public.gmane.org>
To: marcelo.tosatti-3EexvZdKGZRWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, len.brown@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] Don't save state in ACPI on shutdown/reboot
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:14:43 +0100
Message-ID: <20031111131443.GA23874-/48724CwFAA@public.gmane.org>
The ACPI code in 2.4 currently saves the machine state as for a
suspend when doing an reboot or shutdown. This fails on x86-64
on some boxes.
Don't save/restore state in ACPI when entering S5.
-Andi
diff -u linux-2.4.21/drivers/acpi/system.c-o linux-2.4.21/drivers/acpi/system.c
--- linux-2.4.21/drivers/acpi/system.c-o 2003-09-23 00:40:19.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.4.21/drivers/acpi/system.c 2003-09-23 01:05:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -118,7 +118,8 @@
* been loaded from disk.
*/
if (state > ACPI_STATE_S1) {
- acpi_restore_state_mem();
+ if (state != ACPI_STATE_S5)
+ acpi_restore_state_mem();
/* Do _early_ resume for irqs. Required by
* ACPI specs.
@@ -127,6 +128,7 @@
* interrupts.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+ /* AK: this looks rather broken in APIC mode */
init_8259A(0);
#endif
/* wait for power to come back */
@@ -200,7 +202,7 @@
ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE();
/* Do arch specific saving of state. */
- if (state > ACPI_STATE_S1) {
+ if (state > ACPI_STATE_S1 && state < ACPI_STATE_S5) {
error = acpi_save_state_mem();
/* TBD: if no s4bios, write codes for
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: <1068567824.24982.21.camel-D2Zvc0uNKG8@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] Don't save state in ACPI on shutdown/reboot] [not found] ` <1068567824.24982.21.camel-D2Zvc0uNKG8@public.gmane.org> @ 2003-11-11 17:00 ` Ducrot Bruno [not found] ` <20031111170035.GD29175-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Ducrot Bruno @ 2003-11-11 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Len Brown; +Cc: ACPI Developers On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:23:44AM -0500, Len Brown wrote: > Content-Description: Forwarded message - [PATCH] Don't save state in ACPI on shutdown/reboot > From: Andi Kleen <ak-h9bWGtP8wOw@public.gmane.org> > To: marcelo.tosatti-3EexvZdKGZRWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, len.brown@intel.com > Subject: [PATCH] Don't save state in ACPI on shutdown/reboot > X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2003 13:15:03.0923 (UTC) > FILETIME=[D1A1BC30:01C3A855] > > > The ACPI code in 2.4 currently saves the machine state as for a > suspend when doing an reboot or shutdown. This fails on x86-64 > on some boxes. > > Don't save/restore state in ACPI when entering S5. That break also some i386 boxes. That why I submitted another patch (do I have to post it again?) > > -Andi > ... > @@ -127,6 +128,7 @@ > * interrupts. > */ > #ifdef CONFIG_X86 > + /* AK: this looks rather broken in APIC mode */ > init_8259A(0); I know. In fact, this may be not sufficiant for PIC mode as well. -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20031111170035.GD29175-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] Don't save state in ACPI on shutdown/reboot] [not found] ` <20031111170035.GD29175-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> @ 2003-11-12 22:05 ` Dave Jones [not found] ` <20031112220559.GR31026-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Dave Jones @ 2003-11-12 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ducrot Bruno; +Cc: Len Brown, ak-h9bWGtP8wOw, ACPI Developers On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:00:35PM +0100, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > > The ACPI code in 2.4 currently saves the machine state as for a > > suspend when doing an reboot or shutdown. This fails on x86-64 > > on some boxes. > > > > Don't save/restore state in ACPI when entering S5. > > That break also some i386 boxes. That why I submitted another patch (do > I have to post it again?) Do you mean Andi's patch breaks i386 boxes, or this bug also appears on i386 ? The former seems unlikely from the look of Andi's patch. What does your patch do? Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20031112220559.GR31026-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] Don't save state in ACPI on shutdown/reboot] [not found] ` <20031112220559.GR31026-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2003-11-12 23:07 ` Ducrot Bruno 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Ducrot Bruno @ 2003-11-12 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Jones; +Cc: Len Brown, ak-h9bWGtP8wOw, ACPI Developers On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:05:59PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:00:35PM +0100, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > > > > The ACPI code in 2.4 currently saves the machine state as for a > > > suspend when doing an reboot or shutdown. This fails on x86-64 > > > on some boxes. > > > > > > Don't save/restore state in ACPI when entering S5. > > > > That break also some i386 boxes. That why I submitted another patch (do > > I have to post it again?) > > Do you mean Andi's patch breaks i386 boxes, or this bug also appears > on i386 ? The former seems unlikely from the look of Andi's patch. > I wanted to point that some i386 boxes are broken as well, and then a patch is needed. And yes, when I read again my email, that a bit confusing. The patch I send actually implement the exact same behaviour of 2.6 (minus S5 via the proc file, disabled on 2.6). Also, it is much likely a design fix. 'power off' shall not be dependant of CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP (even though than one is always yes for 2.4 if CONFIG_ACPI, at least on i386). Cheers, -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-11-12 23:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-11 16:23 [Fwd: [PATCH] Don't save state in ACPI on shutdown/reboot] Len Brown
[not found] ` <1068567824.24982.21.camel-D2Zvc0uNKG8@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-11 17:00 ` Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20031111170035.GD29175-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-12 22:05 ` Dave Jones
[not found] ` <20031112220559.GR31026-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-12 23:07 ` Ducrot Bruno
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox