From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wwp Subject: Re: ACPI status in 2.4 tree Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:43:24 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20031119154324.6bbc067f.subscript@free.fr> References: <20031119135203.373043b0.subscript@free.fr> <20031119142918.GF32464@poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20031119142918.GF32464-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi Ducrot Bruno, On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:29:18 +0100 Ducrot Bruno wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:52:03PM +0100, wwp wrote: > > Hi ACPI guyz, > > > > > > are 2.4's release candidates sync'ed w/ ACPI? > > IOW, if I get 2.4.23-rc2, will it include the latest ACPI code from acpi.sf.net > > (except the test patches) or will I have to get'n'apply a patch? > > > > Why not just looking in the log? at ? > From ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/testing/patch-2.4.23.log That's exactly what I did (and I use to), but I did't know if the [ACPI] prefix implies that it's a sync' between acpi.sf.net project and Linux kernel or a simple ACPI stuff merged to Linux. That's why I was asking :-\. Regards, -- wwp ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/