From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wwp Subject: Re: ACPI status in 2.4 tree Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:46:38 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20031119164638.628287da.subscript@free.fr> References: <20031119135203.373043b0.subscript@free.fr> <20031119142918.GF32464@poupinou.org> <3FBB8840.1090306@pca.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3FBB8840.1090306-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi Luca Capello, On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:12:00 +0100 Luca Capello wrote: > on 11/19/03 15:29, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > | Why not just looking in the log? at ? > |>From ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/testing/patch-2.4.23.log > it's not simpler look at ACPI patches release section? > http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches/release/ Yep, that's also what I did. Found patches against 2.4.23-rc1.. and it says nothing about rc2 merging status. How funny that people cannot say "yes" or "no" and prefer sending unclear answers :-\. Regards, -- wwp ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/