From: wwp <subscript-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: ACPI status in 2.4 tree
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:31:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031119193105.02361704.subscript@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031119170515.GY30485-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
Hi Matthew Wilcox,
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:05:15 +0000 Matthew Wilcox <willy-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:46:38PM +0100, wwp wrote:
> > How funny that people cannot say "yes" or "no" and prefer sending
> > unclear answers :-\.
>
> They're showing you how to find out for yourself. You should be
> grateful.
Hum maybe I wasn't clear in my words (sorry English is not my natural
language). I meant that I use to look at the download site and the kernel
changelog to find the latest ACPI code.
My question was not "where to find ACPI patches for kernel X or Y?". I was just
wondering in *usually* kernel pre-releases and release candidates were waiting
for latest acpi to be merged or if acpi development were not sync'ed but for
stable releases. And if more precisely, the ACPI merging shown in rc2's
changelogs mean that all the latest ACPI changes were merged to the kernel
source (IOW: is is necessary to apply patches over 2.4.23-rc2 to get the
latest ACPI stuff).
Moreover, in a more educational way, showing books to a dumb guy won't
help, neither showing books without teaching how to read :-).
Thanx anyway,
best regards
--
wwp
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-19 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-19 12:52 ACPI status in 2.4 tree wwp
[not found] ` <20031119135203.373043b0.subscript-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-19 14:29 ` Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20031119142918.GF32464-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-19 14:43 ` wwp
2003-11-19 15:12 ` Luca Capello
[not found] ` <3FBB8840.1090306-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-19 15:46 ` wwp
[not found] ` <20031119164638.628287da.subscript-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-19 17:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
[not found] ` <20031119170515.GY30485-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-19 18:31 ` wwp [this message]
[not found] ` <20031119193105.02361704.subscript-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-20 15:18 ` Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20031120151828.GJ32464-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-20 15:43 ` wwp
2003-11-19 17:24 ` Micha Feigin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-19 18:09 Brown, Len
[not found] ` <BF1FE1855350A0479097B3A0D2A80EE00147D1FD-N2PTB0HCzHJF3Yvz3xaN/VDQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-19 19:50 ` wwp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031119193105.02361704.subscript@free.fr \
--to=subscript-ganu6spqydw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox