From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William Morgan Subject: Re: acpi on new gateway laptops Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:36:48 -0500 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20031120213648.GC21802@masanjin.net> References: <20031112232315.GD430@masanjin.net> <20031117102219.O60721@root.org> <20031117183900.GA32570@masanjin.net> <20031117104936.N60907@root.org> <20031117193719.GB32570@masanjin.net> <20031117120555.E61216@root.org> <20031118103549.GZ32464@poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031118103549.GZ32464-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Excerpts (reformatted) from Ducrot Bruno's mail of 18 Nov 2003 (EST): > > Looks right but you need to get your _GPE bit also. I think it's 0x79 > > but you really need to parse the buffer to be sure. There is a flag to > > acpidmp to parse buffer contents. > > Not in the backported version IIRC. There wasn't an option to do this in the acpidmp I found, but luckily the DSDT specified the _GPE as 0x1c a little later on. -- William ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/