From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: SCI interrupt handler : spend too much time Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:19:37 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20031208091937.GB241@elf.ucw.cz> References: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C04@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720C04-SRlDPOYGfgogGBtAFL8yw7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Yu, Luming" Cc: roychris , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > To SCI handler itself, I don't think keyboard controller will be touched. But SCI handler could evaluate some AML method which could touch keyboard controller. --Luming > Would that be a bug in AML method? Or how is keyboard-controller access locked between OS and ACPI? Pavel > > Does it mean the overhead of SCI interrupt was not the root cause of > > this issue. --Luming > > It certainly looks so. Is it possible that SCI handler touches > keyboard controller? > -- When do you have heart between your knees? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/